Yu Darvish's $126 Million Contract With The Cubs Might Be Worth Even More Than That

By on February 16, 2018 in ArticlesSports News

The Chicago Cubs agreed to a six-year, $126 million deal with pitcher Yu Darvish. One of the most sought-after pitchers this offseason, Darvish also received interest from the Brewers, Rangers, Dodgers, Astros, and Twins.

And the contract contains escalators that could make the contract worth more than $150 million over the six years of the deal.

Darvish was 10-12 with a 3.86 ERA in 31 starts last season. For his career, he's averaged 11 strikeouts per nine innings – more than any other pitcher with at least 100 career starts. His career record is 56-42 with a 3.42 ERA and a 1.18 WHIP.

Getty Images

He joins the Cubs just a week before the team begins Spring Training. Darvish will replace Jake Arrieta in the rotation and will look to help the Cubs return to the World Series. Chicago has reached the National League Championship Series every year since 2015, winning a championship in 2016.

In limited appearances against the NL Central, Darvish has been quite effective. He's posted a 2.42 ERA in eight career starts versus NL Central opponents, never giving up more than three runs in a game.

Darvish's contract marks the fourth time the Cubs have given more than $100 million to a free agent. Only the Yankees – with six such deals – have offered more triple-digit contracts.

If Darvish can help the Cubs win another championship, he'll be worth every penny.

Articles Written by Joey Held
If there's a story anywhere in the world of music, sports, or entertainment, Joey wants to tell it. He's been freelancing since 2010, and prior to that, he attended the University of Miami, where he double majored in broadcast journalism and sport administration. A Chicago native, Joey currently resides in Austin, TX. Follow him on Twitter and Google+ and always feel free to suggest a song for his next karaoke performance.
Did we make a mistake?
Submit a correction suggestion and help us fix it!
Submit a Correction
Discussion